In September 11 conspiracy researches, significant elements have been neglected: Twin Towers falling is one of them
On Twin Towers conspiracy, almost all pieces of evidence were quickly removed, in fact all but one. It is spread all over America on tape recorders by American families: the dustification of the Twin Towers on 9/11 broadcast on TV.
All images on this post were taken on September 11. These pictures are very eloquent, taken immediately before, during or immediately after the Twin Towers falling.
Now, one thing really popped out: the almost total absence of debris.
The twin towers left a minimal pile of debris immediately after the September 11 attacks, abuot 14.6-acre (5.9 ha) area in Lower Manhattan in New York City. As a result, the debris pile was nowhere near tall enough to account for the aggregate mass of the towers and their contents, about 20 feet versus the 160 predicted.
What happened on September 11 2001?
Certainly we have a few images of the Wtc7 collapse and Twin Towers falling, but one in particular is most noteworthy.
So special to draw attention of the most importantly members of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
So relevant to draw attention of a materials scientist and assistant professor of mechanical engineering, Dr Judy Wood.
This picture, taken from 9/11 Research site and attribuited to Doug Kanter, is however noteworthy. This photo, in fact, is at the center of a September 11 conspiracy dispute concerning the World Trade Center 7. A debate relang to a missing damage, that would lead to the Wtc7 collapse on September 11.
What happened on September 11 2001?
The collapse of the World Trade Center towers shocked the World and changed the United States in significant ways. Why did they fall?
We won’t speak of theories or speculation, but evidence. It’s a part of the body of empirical evidence about Twin Towers falling that, if explained, can determine what really happened on 9/11.
It’s imperative that anyone seriously advancing understanding of the mechanisms of collapse hew closely to scientific methodology.
The scientific method requires us to look at all the available evidence and then assess various explanations for their ability to account for the evidence.
How did Twin Towers fall straight down?
At some point, just as in pure science, the inferior explanations must be discarded if there is to be continued progress in an investigation.
If we look at the evidence, the evidence will tell us exactly what happened on September 11th 2001. Empirical evidence of Twin Towers dustification.
Wtc7is destroyed essentially from the bottom up in a gravity-assisted collapse. The Twin Towers on 9/11are primarily top-down, virtually unassisted by gravity, and destroyed by a combination of conventional and unconventional devices.
The complete destruction of such massive buildings shocked nearly everyone.
Have you seen the like of it?
In other words, all the data are consistent with an directed free-energy weapon.
Why did the Twin Towers collapse?
First of all, Wtc7 is the skyscraper in the upper right of the picture. After that, in the middle, we find the partially crushed and burned-out remains of the Wtc4. Furthermore, we see the Wtc5, the dark object to the right. In addition, on the right, we can also notice the traffic light which show us the street level.
The shadows in this photograph, taken from a vantage point looking toward the north, suggest a time in the morning.
Minutes earlier, one of the world’s largest office buildings, was standing here: the Wtc2, with its 1.362 feet tall.
And yet the remaining rubble are only a few stories high.
To say it in the words of John Lamb Lash: the manipulation of events on a global scale, historically, involves the use of a controlled opposition.
As often happens when you’re in the field of disinformation, however, you are in a bind. No one highlighting an item that should be obvious to the observer, the proverbial elephant in the room: Twin Towers dustification.
September 11 attacks – Wtc7 collapse
According to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, when you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
One of the most important questions underlying the Twin Towers conspiracy is: why did the Twin Towers collapse?
Two government reports provide slightly different explanations of the possible processes that ultimately brought the buildings to the ground.
On August 21, 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology announce its building and fire safety investigation of Wtc.
Study, funded by the U.S. Congress through FEMA, is conduct under the authority of the National Construction Safety Team Act.
World Trade Center Disaster Study Reports
NIST claims that the Wtc7 collapse “essentially in free fall, indicating negligible support from the structure below”.
Concluding, NIST asserts that the World Trade Center 7 collapse in a “gravitational acceleration (free fall)”.
In the years since September 11 attacks, many other individual engineers and committees of experts have studied World Trade Center 7 collapse.
Using videos, photographs and building design documents, the investigators at the NIST spent many years building an elaborate computer model of 7 World Trade Center that they used to test various chains of events to figure out what caused the collapse.
The investigators determined that the structural damage from the falling debris was not significant enough to threaten the tower’s stability. The official story of an “inevitable” collapse by gravity alone is impossible because it conflicts with laws of physics.
Final Reports from the NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation
In a storm of criticism, on 2008, NIST was forced to admit the facts that he had repeatedly denied. In particular, the National Institute of Standards and Technology argued that “this is the first time that we are aware of, that a building taller than about 15 stories has collapsed primarily due to fires“.
The fire is the most misunderstood part of the Wtc collapse. Even today, the media report (and many scientists believe) that the steel melted.
This is not true.
While none of the many 9/11 researchers knows exactly what really happened on September 11 2001, any sensible person can easily spot dozens of inconsistencies in the official story that is being forced upon us.
The official story appears to be flawed in several ways, but the focus of this article is on just one point: the odd collapse of the Twin Towers in the World Trade Center complex.
As noted above, many engineers and committees of experts have studied Wtc7 collapse. Very few people, on the contrary, have been focusing on Twin Towers falling.
Twin Towers falling: nano-thermite explains why did the Twin Towers collapse but not Wtc dustification
The photo of Wtc7 shows us no damage and no fires affecting the building after Twin Towers falling.
Accurate, geographically oriented digital models of the World Trade Center made by Google Sketchup, determine the time when the photograph was taken.
Findings show that the models cast the correct shadows only between 9:40 am, and 10:20 am.
This picture was taken while North Tower was still standing, but hidden by the smoke of the collapsed South Tower.
Twin Towers falling – Pictures don’t lie
The shadows projected on Wtc4 and Wtc5, leave lit a significant slice of the square outside the Wtc4 just before Wtc1 collapse. The size of the illuminated slice is maximum around 10:00 am.
Moreover, after the North Tower collapse, at 10:28 am, the illuminated area decreases more and more until it disappears.
In addition, another element is the partial Wtc5’s lighting. Observing the photo, a narrow vertical band of the façade, facing the observer, is illuminated. The rest is in the shade.
This configuration of shadows, however, occurs only between 9:40 am, and 10:20 am. 9:40 am, when the sun begins to illuminate the area, and 10:20 am, when the band becomes visibly wider.
In conclusion, the only time when we get these shadows is before the North Tower collapse.
This photo was taken between 09:58 am, when the Wtc2 collapse, and 10:20 am, before the band becomes larger.
Bill Biggart – 9/11 Twin Towers pictures
Doug Kanter’s Twin Towers pictures are only part of many inexplicable images about structural dustification of the steel.
Other Twin Towers pictures were taken by Bill Biggart, the only professional photographer to be killed while covering the September 11 attacks. In some of these images, we can see the steel structures totally polverized. He was killed by the collapse of the North Tower.
So, his Twin Towers pictures was taken while North Tower was still standing, about 20 minutes after the South Tower collapse.
10:28:24 a.m. on September 11th, 2001 was the precise second that Bill Biggart took the final shot of his life. He took his last breath moments later when the North Tower of the World Trade Center collapsed upon him.
This photo was taken 2 seconds before the North Tower collapsed. Thirty minutes after the South Tower falling. We can see more street lamps, traffic lights and some emergency vehicles, just not what we were expecting: a mountain of jumbled debris.
Say, did you ever see something like that?
Dustification of Wtc: in a few minutes, all that remains of the Twin Towers is a pile of dust
Twin Towers pictures of Doug Kanter and Bill Biggart are taken with the North Tower still standing.
The following picture, instead, shows the scenario just after the collapse of the North Tower. After the World Trade Center Twin Towers falling: 1.362 feet tall and 1.368 feet tall.
We can see street lamps and a flag pole which show us the street level. In addition, we can also notice the Vesey Street Bridge, or North Bridge, connected the above-ground concourse of the former World Trade Center complex with the World Financial Center.
The remaining rubble are only a few stories high.
Where are the 220 floors of debris?
Twin Towers falling: if you’re experiment contradicts intuition, check your experiment
Dr Judy Wood was the first to coin the term dustification referring to September 11 attacks. She uses this expression in order to explain the Twin Towers collapse’s anomalous evidence, for which normal terms are inadequate.
Dr Judy Wood is a materials scientist and former assistant professor of mechanical engineering.
She earned her doctorate in materials engineering science from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg in 1992. Her dissertation was on the topic of thermal stresses in bimaterial joints.
How the Twin Towers get destroyed?
In Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11, exposes the forensic evidence of Wtc dustification.
She has applied her expertise in materials science, image analysis and interferometry, to a forensic study of over 40.000 images. Similarly, she analyzed videos, witnesses, seismic data and other environmental evidence pertaining to the destruction of the Wtc complex on September 11 attacks.
Have you ever seen anything like this?
Dr Judy Wood and Twin Towers falling: SDI behind September 11 attacks?
Even more, she hypothesizes that, on September 11 attacks, a directed free-energy weapon has destroyed the Twin Towers.
We must keep in mind that energy weapons exist.
The study and the applications of this new kind of weapons are not a fantasy, they have existed for at least 100 years.
US President Ronald Reagan created the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), renamed “Star Wars” by an opponent. More specifically, we are talking about Dr Carol Rosin, a consultant and former spokeswoman for Wernher von Braun.
However, Missile Defense Agency historians attribute the term to a Washington Post article, published on March 24, 1983.
This technology is classified.
In order to understand what really happened to the World Trade Center buildings, we need to start with the evidence.
The best theory about what happened on September 11 2001 should explain all the real evidence.
So what types of evidence are available?
Twin Towers falling – Dr Judy Wood and directed free-energy
On her web site, Dr Judy Wood presents a 41-point list of “the principal evidence that must be explained”.
For instance, “the upper 80%, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and didn’t crash to the earth”. After that, “the seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition”.
In Where Did the Towers Go?, she tries to explane why did the Twin Towers collapse.
“The Twin Towers were not crushed or ground up; they turned into dust mid-air. They were not vaporized, either. Vaporization refers to the conversion of a liquid or solid to the vapour state by the addition of latent heat.
The buildings were not cooked; they were turned to dust in mid-air. This was a new process and a new process needs a new word to represent it. We will call this dustification.”
Where did the Towers go?
Seismic readings gave no indication that a large amount of material hit the ground.
“If such a large amount of material had crashed to the ground, ‘the bathtub’ – a basin around the Wtc foundation designed to keep the Hudson River’s waters at bay – would have been severely ruptured, leading to severe flooding of lower Manhattan. But that didn’t happen.
The pile of rubble from the Tower only made up about 2% of the building original height.
If you listen to the evidence carefully enough, it will speak to you and tell you exactly what happened.”
Twin Towers pictures: forensic evidence of dustification by Dr Judy Wood
Dr Judy Wood‘s study and observations, demonstrate it was not a collapse, but a real Twin Towers dustification.
“Somebody has the technology to disrupt and direct the molecular bonds of matter”, she said to her college audience. “Empirical evidence is the artifact that the truth left behind. I’m not talking about a ‘weapon’. I’m talking about a destructive mechanism”.
In conclusion, much of the South Tower’s mass simply turned to dust while the Wtc2 were still in the air.
Twin Towers pictures – Some example of dustification on September 11
We can see many other example of dustification on September 11 Twin Towers pictures. One of the most compelling is the ambulance parked on ground level in front of Wtc1. You would expect that a pile of rubble to bury it.
In contrast, other than some dust on top of it, and a door slightly askew, it appears to be undamaged. At maybe 8 feet high, the intact ambulance is actually higher than a lot of the rubble found around it. We can even see the ground, through the rubble, next to the ambulance.
There is not a piece of glass or marble, not a desk, a sink, or a doorknob. We don’t find a chair, a telephone or a computer. Furthermore, the biggest piece of office furniture recovered from Ground Zero is a tiny fragment of a telephone keypad.
The only “office supply” of significance we see are sheets of paper.
Endless expanses of paper.
On September 11, 2001.
In July 2001, just two months before the terrorist attacks of September 11, the Port Authority agreed to lease the twin towers to Larry Silverstein, a New York City developer. Silverstein and several minority investors won the contract for a 99-year lease on the Twin Towers for $3.2 billion (including debt).
Wtc 1,2,3, 7 and the St Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church were totally destroyed.
Wtc 4,5, and 6 were destroyed to an extent where there could be no chance of repair.
The Deutsche Bank and Fiterman Hall were damaged to such an extent that it was deemed that they were not suitable for repair.
Ground Zero originated as a term to describe the site of a nuclear explosion and later was used to refer to the point of any dramatic or violent event. New Yorkers started calling the World Trade Center site Ground Zero shortly after September 11 attacks.
The World Trade Center site, formerly referred to as “Ground Zero” or “the Pile” immediately after the September 11 attacks, is a 14.6-acre (5.9 ha) area in Lower Manhattan in New York City.
50,000 workers and 200,000 daily visitors.
The death toll was 2,606 in the World Trade Center and in the surrounding area.
One World Trade Center (also known as One WTC or Freedom Tower) is the main building of the rebuilt World Trade Center complex in Lower Manhattan, New York City.
George W. Bush.