Twin Towers falling – Collapse or dustification?

In September 11 conspiracy researches, significant elements have been neglected: Twin Towers dustification is one of them

On Twin Towers conspiracy, almost all pieces of evidence were quickly removed, in fact all but one. It is spread all over America on tape recorders by American families: the dustification of the Twin Towers on 9/11 broadcast on TV.

All images on this post were taken on September 11. These pictures are very eloquent, taken immediately before, during or immediately after the Twin Towers falling.

Now, one thing really popped out: the almost total absence of debris.

The twin towers left a minimal pile of debris immediately after the September 11 attacks, abuot 14.6-acre (5.9 ha) area in Lower Manhattan in New York City. As a result, the debris pile was nowhere near tall enough to account for the aggregate mass of the towers and their contents, about 20 feet versus the 160 predicted.

What happened on September 11 2001?

Certainly we have a few images of theWtc7 collapseandTwin Towers falling, but one in particular is most noteworthy.

So special to draw attention of the most importantly members of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
So relevant to draw attention of a materials scientist and assistant professor of mechanical engineering, Dr Judy Wood.

Twin Towers falling - Collapse or dustification? - Photo by Doug Kanter
Photo by Doug Kanter

This picture, taken from 9/11 Research site and attribuited to Doug Kanter, is however noteworthy. This photo, in fact, is at the center of a September 11 conspiracy dispute concerning the World Trade Center 7. A debate relang to a missing damage, that would lead to the Wtc7 collapse on September 11.

Content index

What happened on September 11 2001?

The collapse of the World Trade Center towers shocked the World and changed the United States in significant ways. Why did they fall?

We won’t speak of theories or speculation, but evidence. It’s a part of the body of empirical evidence about Twin Towers falling that, if explained, can determine what really happened on 9/11.

Twin Towers falling - Collapse or dustification? - Photo by Steve McCurry
Photo by Steve McCurry

It’s imperative that anyone seriously advancing understanding of the mechanisms of collapse hew closely to scientific methodology.
The scientific method requires us to look at all the available evidence and then assess various explanations for their ability to account for the evidence.

How did Twin Towers fall straight down?

At some point, just as in pure science, the inferior explanations must be discarded if there is to be continued progress in an investigation.

If we look at the evidence, the evidence will tell us exactly what happened on September 11th 2001. Empirical evidence of Twin Towers dustification.

Wtc7is destroyed essentially from the bottom up in a gravity-assisted collapse. The Twin Towers on 9/11are primarily top-down, virtually unassisted by gravity, and destroyed by a combination of conventional and unconventional devices.

The complete destruction of such massive buildings shocked nearly everyone.

Have you seen the like of it?

Twin Towers falling - Collapse or dustification? - Photo by Alexandre Fuchs
Photo by Alexandre Fuchs

In other words, all the data are consistent with an directed free-energy weapon.

Why did the Twin Towers collapse?

First of all, Wtc7 is the skyscraper in the upper right of the picture. After that, in the middle, we find the partially crushed and burned-out remains of the Wtc4. Furthermore, we see the Wtc5, the dark object to the right. In addition, on the right, we can also notice the traffic light which show us the street level.

The shadows in this photograph, taken from a vantage point looking toward the north, suggest a time in the morning.

Minutes earlier, one of the world’s largest office buildings, was standing here: the Wtc2, with its 1.362 feet tall.

And yet the remaining rubble are only a few stories high.

Twin Towers falling - Collapse or dustification? - Photo by James Nachtwey
Photo by James Nachtwey

To say it in the words of John Lamb Lash: the manipulation of events on a global scale, historically, involves the use of a controlled opposition.

As often happens when you’re in the field of disinformation, however, you are in a bind. No one highlighting an item that should be obvious to the observer, the proverbial elephant in the room: Twin Towers dustification.

September 11 attacks  Wtc7 collapse

According to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, when you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

One of the most important questions underlying the Twin Towers conspiracy is: why did the Twin Towers collapse?

Two government reports provide slightly different explanations of the possible processes that ultimately brought the buildings to the ground.

On August 21, 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology announce its building and fire safety investigation of Wtc.

Twin Towers falling - Collapse or dustification? - Photo by Peter Morgan
Photo by Peter Morgan

Study, funded by the U.S. Congress through FEMA, is conduct under the authority of the National Construction Safety Team Act.

World Trade Center Disaster Study Reports

NIST claims that the Wtc7 collapse “essentially in free fall, indicating negligible support from the structure below”.
Concluding, NIST asserts that the World Trade Center 7 collapse in a gravitational acceleration (free fall)”.

In the years since September 11 attacks, many other individual engineers and committees of experts have studied World Trade Center 7 collapse.

Twin Towers falling - Collapse or dustification? - Photo by Thomas E. Franklin
Photo by Thomas E. Franklin

Using videos, photographs and building design documents, the investigators at the NIST spent many years building an elaborate computer model of 7 World Trade Center that they used to test various chains of events to figure out what caused the collapse.

The investigators determined that the structural damage from the falling debris was not significant enough to threaten the tower’s stability. The official story of an “inevitable” collapse by gravity alone is impossible because it conflicts with laws of physics.

Final Reports from the NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation

In a storm of criticism, on 2008, NIST was forced to admit the facts that he had repeatedly denied. In particular, the National Institute of Standards and Technology argued that this is the first time that we are aware of, that a building taller than about 15 stories has collapsed primarily due to fires.

The fire is the most misunderstood part of the Wtc collapse. Even today, the media report (and many scientists believe) that the steel melted.

This is not true.

Twin Towers falling - Collapse or dustification? - Photo by Doug Kanter
Photo by Doug Kanter

While none of the many 9/11 researchers knows exactly what really happened on September 11 2001, any sensible person can easily spot dozens of inconsistencies in the official story that is being forced upon us.

The official story appears to be flawed in several ways, but the focus of this article is on just one point: the odd collapse of the Twin Towers in the World Trade Center complex.

As noted above, many engineers and committees of experts have studied Wtc7 collapse. Very few people, on the contrary, have been focusing on Twin Towers falling.

Twin Towers falling: nano-thermite explains why did the Twin Towers collapse but not Wtc dustification

The photo of Wtc7 shows us no damage and no fires affecting the building after Twin Towers falling.

Accurate, geographically oriented digital models of the World Trade Center made by Google Sketchup, determine the time when the photograph was taken.

Twin Towers falling - Collapse or dustification?
Time is shifted forward by an hour because Google Sketchup doesn’t take account by the Daylight Saving Time (DST)

Time is shifted forward by an hour because Google Sketchup doesn’t take account by the Daylight Saving Time (DST).

Findings show that the models cast the correct shadows only between 9:40 am, and 10:20 am.

This picture was taken while North Tower was still standing, but hidden by the smoke of the collapsed South Tower.

Twin Towers falling – Pictures don’t lie